Steelmaker said this in another post on the RC Forum so I thought I would bring it here.
Now , if the sources are corrupt what will that do to its end product? I would say that the results of a corrupt source would only produce a corrupt product. There is no doubt whatsoever that both Codex Vaticanius and Codex Sinaiticus are corrupt , why they don't even agree with each other on numerous verses. By their FRUIT you shall know them.
One of these manuscripts was found in the Vatican Pope's library and the other one was found in a trashcan.
How's that for a corrupt source? That's what you get when you read one of those New translations that Steelmaker claims came from a good source??
I have said umpteen times that a valid version is one which accurately(not always perfectly) follows its sources.
Now , if the sources are corrupt what will that do to its end product? I would say that the results of a corrupt source would only produce a corrupt product. There is no doubt whatsoever that both Codex Vaticanius and Codex Sinaiticus are corrupt , why they don't even agree with each other on numerous verses. By their FRUIT you shall know them.
One of these manuscripts was found in the Vatican Pope's library and the other one was found in a trashcan.
How's that for a corrupt source? That's what you get when you read one of those New translations that Steelmaker claims came from a good source??
