Matthew,
This topic of which line of KJB is very interesting and has really taken my heart.
As one site has said,the KJBonly debate with the critics is basically over.The King James Bible has won.
Well that is obvious.
Now we need to get to the task at hand.
Taking this discussion up to the next level as it were.
To bring about and work towards a providential revival of truth from the very truth.
I have noticed that you have had the ability and time to segregate the various editions of the Holy Bible.
So I have a simple question or two.
First,a suggestion:
Would it not be very beneficial if over the course of time that if someone had the ability to make charts?This way we could see first hand by the chart the tree of Holy Bibles and where they follow one text and that type of scenario.
1] I have started to get King James Bibles.Amongst the collection,I have been able to get a couple older ones.
My oldest to date is a 1663 Cambridge Edition printed by John Fielde.
It is a red ruled edition and does not come with the Apocrypha.
It includes the marginal notes,plus the first word for the next page at the bottom of each page.
How can I tell which revision it comes from?
Do I need to follow Scrivener's work to decide?
2]My next oldest Bible is an Oxford 1726 with the Book of Common Prayer [Church of England]This one does include the Apocryphal books,has the Marginal references and the first word of the next page at the bottom of each page.
The printer is John Baskett.
He printed the New Testament in 1725.
The same question as above.
Obviously it is before 1769 so it would be interesting to figure this one out.
If you would like,
I could give a list of various spellings and words used for specific passages,if you feel that is needed.
Peter Fuhrman
Every word of God is pure:
This topic of which line of KJB is very interesting and has really taken my heart.
As one site has said,the KJBonly debate with the critics is basically over.The King James Bible has won.
Well that is obvious.
Now we need to get to the task at hand.
Taking this discussion up to the next level as it were.
To bring about and work towards a providential revival of truth from the very truth.
I have noticed that you have had the ability and time to segregate the various editions of the Holy Bible.
So I have a simple question or two.
First,a suggestion:
Would it not be very beneficial if over the course of time that if someone had the ability to make charts?This way we could see first hand by the chart the tree of Holy Bibles and where they follow one text and that type of scenario.
1] I have started to get King James Bibles.Amongst the collection,I have been able to get a couple older ones.
My oldest to date is a 1663 Cambridge Edition printed by John Fielde.
It is a red ruled edition and does not come with the Apocrypha.
It includes the marginal notes,plus the first word for the next page at the bottom of each page.
How can I tell which revision it comes from?
Do I need to follow Scrivener's work to decide?
2]My next oldest Bible is an Oxford 1726 with the Book of Common Prayer [Church of England]This one does include the Apocryphal books,has the Marginal references and the first word of the next page at the bottom of each page.
The printer is John Baskett.
He printed the New Testament in 1725.
The same question as above.
Obviously it is before 1769 so it would be interesting to figure this one out.
If you would like,
I could give a list of various spellings and words used for specific passages,if you feel that is needed.
Peter Fuhrman
Every word of God is pure:
