logos1560 wrote:

That same line can be traced back into our Bibles such as the 1560 Geneva Bible, the 1611 KJV, the 1833 revision of the KJV by Noah Webster, the 1842 revision of the KJV by Bible-believing Baptists and other believers, the 1982 NKJV, the Modern KJV by Jay Green, the KJ21, the KJ2000. These later English translations clearly belong on this same line as those translations that KJV-only advocates place on that line such as the Syriac Peshitta, the Old Latin, the Waldensian Bibles, the 1535 Coverdale's Bible, the Great Bible, the Bishops' Bible. The actual facts concerning that line do not result in the man-made KJV-only theory.

There is no King James, Bishops, Geneva, Great Bible, or anything after if Not for William Tyndales Translations. Just an oversight I'm sure. But you accidently left out the reason were are able to have a Bible in English at all.


Last Edited By: gconan Apr 18 09 4:53 PM. Edited 1 times.