ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 85958
Apr 18 09 4:16 PM
Administrator
logos1560 wrote: Shain1611 wrote: We will stay with the fact that ... there is a God honored line of thousands of manuscripts and that not only can be proved but is in fact traced back into our Bibles. If you can claim it as a fact, perhaps you can tell us how many of that "line of thousands of manuscripts" you have actually examined and compared word-for-word. How many of the translations placed on that good line have you actually examined? That same line can be traced back into our Bibles such as the 1560 Geneva Bible, the 1611 KJV, the 1833 revision of the KJV by Noah Webster, the 1842 revision of the KJV by Bible-believing Baptists and other believers, the 1982 NKJV, the Modern KJV by Jay Green, the KJ21, the KJ2000. These later English translations clearly belong on this same line as those translations that KJV-only advocates place on that line such as the Syriac Peshitta, the Old Latin, the Waldensian Bibles, the 1535 Coverdale's Bible, the Great Bible, the Bishops' Bible. The actual facts concerning that line do not result in the man-made KJV-only theory. Sometimes you seem to think that KJV-only assumptions and speculations are facts.
Shain1611 wrote: We will stay with the fact that ... there is a God honored line of thousands of manuscripts and that not only can be proved but is in fact traced back into our Bibles.
Share This