Hi Shain,

I don't know enough about either of the manuscripts you mentioned to be able to respond as to their accuracy.

But I do know that where they were found has nothing to do with how accurate they are.

The same goes for those who say that since King James was a homosexual that the KJV must therefore be corrupt.

Whether or not he was a homosexual has nothing to do with the accuracy of the KJV. I would assume that the men who translated the KJV were of such high character that they would have put together the very best translation they could regardless of James' sexual "preferences".

I doubt that either of us has enough firsthand knowlege to know the accuracy of the two manuscripts you mentioned. But their accuracy should be determined by means other than the places where they were found.