Yuku free message boards
Username or E-mail:
Password:
Forgot
Password?
Sign Up
Grab the Yuku app
Search:
RSS
Email
Who's your Final Authority
>
Which Bible
>
The KJV accepts multiple versions
0 Points
Search this Topic:
Remove this ad
«Prev
1
2
Next»
Jump
Forum Jump
Bible Rejecters and More
Bible School by the "Book"
Welcome to the King James Bible School
Our Statement of Faith and Our Forum Guidelines
Welcome to all New Members
Prayers and Prayer Request
New Forum
Bible School on Line for Free
General Discussion
Roman Catholicism, its Doctrines, and Church Teachings Debated here.
End Times Prophecies ; Eschatology
Which Bible
Daily Bible Verse Comparison
Reading Room
Cults
Christian only Bible Study Forum With great Sermons to listen to
For Non Christians and Non Believers
General Forum I
Bible Dictionary
Bible DictionaryII
General ForumII
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Re: The KJV accepts multiple versions
Author
Comment
Brother Tim
#1
[-]
Posts
: 223
Jun 26 08 9:50 PM
Reply
Quote
More
My Recent Posts
DC,
Yes, I agree that the translators would not have known the significance of their work.
I cannot give references that are any different than others have done in the past. They would likely have no more effect than what I have already said, because what I have said is prompted only by my reading of the Scriptures themselves. Thankfully, it is not up to me to convince you for I would fail. That must come from the One who lives within you.
That the translators might have considered their work to be imperfect is not important to me as I explained above.
As for multiple versions, I agree that WITHIN THE SINGLE TEXT OF THE KJB ( THE SCRIPTURES), there can be multiple accounts of a single event, each possibly bringing a variation to the description, so that TOGETHER the complete message is given. I cannot agree that God uses multiple modern versions, separated from one another by translators/producers/editors/purpose, to cover the whole truth, especially because often these versions contradict one another concerning the event. Examples of this have been given in other threads.
P.S. Am I right that you agree with me and not with steelmaker about one MORE EXACT translation, rather than ONE MORE exact translation.
P.S.S. steelmaker, based on other statements made by the translators, I doubt that they considered the previous translations to be "exact". Considering their scholarship, I imagine that they could have come up with a better description, if in fact, they were just adding their work to the already completed versions.
P.S.S.S. steelmaker, you claimed, "
Banny's toady constant praise of KJ led to the new Bible being called the "King James" version.
" Please document this "fact". My reading shows that the name "King James Version" did not exist until well after 1900. It had nothing to do with anything with what you claim. It was necessary to identify it to distinquish it from the versions beginning to come out.
In the Service of the KING,
Brother Tim Keyes (Proverbs 3:5-6)
When I fully rely upon God, I find that He is fully reliable.
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Forum Jump
Bible Rejecters and More
Bible School by the "Book"
Welcome to the King James Bible School
Our Statement of Faith and Our Forum Guidelines
Welcome to all New Members
Prayers and Prayer Request
New Forum
Bible School on Line for Free
General Discussion
Roman Catholicism, its Doctrines, and Church Teachings Debated here.
End Times Prophecies ; Eschatology
Which Bible
Daily Bible Verse Comparison
Reading Room
Cults
Christian only Bible Study Forum With great Sermons to listen to
For Non Christians and Non Believers
General Forum I
Bible Dictionary
Bible DictionaryII
General ForumII
Share This
Email to Friend
del.icio.us
Digg it
Facebook
Blogger
Yahoo MyWeb
«Prev
1
2
Next»
Jump
Who's your Final Authority
>
Which Bible
>
The KJV accepts multiple versions
Click to subscribe by RSS
Click to receive E-mail notifications of replies