My point is that Textus Receptus was rife with errors due to a hurry to print. KJVO people reject the much older texts because the (according to the KJVO people) are tainted with Romanism. Nevermind it was a Roman Catholic that translated the Textus Receptus. We have even older manuscripts now, and yet because they don't line up with the KJV, they are somehow wrong. Excuse me, but I would think the older of the two would be the better. But people like you and Shain don't want to hear that. You put your trust in one Catholic translator over a bunch of other ones, then turn around and call Catholics non-Christian.