Shain, is it logical to interpret the facts in a way other than you have? Namely, does your opponent have a point? Or is it just a fabrication?

If there are unanswered questions in your belief, and the opposing belief has correctly used scripture to back up their belief, why would you be so foolish as to be dogmatic about a disputed belief that changes nothing?


"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose" - Jim Elliott, martyred in Quito, Ecuador 1956