ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 85958
Dec 2 06 6:46 PM
Administrator
Quote:Shain, I am completely at a loss how you are interpreting this to mean the exact opposite of what it says. Let's look at it - are they saying that the Word was the Son before he was made flesh? NO, they are "saying that The Word was not the Son before He was made flesh". Are they saying that God the Son was made flesh? NO they they are saying "not that God the Son was made flesh".
Quote:What?? I have no idea what you're trying to say. "Eternal Sonship" is the term used to label the belief that he was rightfully called the "Son" of God before his incarnation. Period.
Quote: The quote does not say "not the Son in the flesh", it says "not the Son".
Quote:But they deny the Son became the Son in the flesh. They believe he wasn't the "Son" until he came in the flesh. They believe the Word became the Son when he was made flesh.
Quote:Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Joh 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God.
Share This