ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 1861
Nov 25 06 5:21 PM
Quote:This is from Ruckman: Quote: ..." for they ( Ruckman, Herb Evans, & Riplinger) believe in the preexistent Word was deity or God and that the God/man, the Son of God is also deity or God. This straw-man issue is merely a semantics exploitation of the Title rather than the Being or Person of our Lord. The contention is over whether HIS Title as the " Son of God " ( rather than His Being) originated and functioned in eternity or time. We are simply saying that The Word was not the Son before He was MADE flesh and dwelt among us not that God the Son was made flesh ( Jn. 1:1,14)
Quote:Now who are we to believe you or the Word of God.
Quote:Before the " Son of God", came into the World and was crucified died and rose from the dead, was anyone saved by GRACE ALONE? If Jesus Christ did not come ( Begotten) he would not be the " Eternal Son-ship" because the Word of God says so, not because those who believe in the " Eternal Son-ship" do.
Quote:As I said before, I never gave this any thought before ,
Quote: Quote: - "We are simply saying that The Word was not the Son before He was so begotten" (BBB, Sep 02, page 8 (from the same paragraph you asked me to quote!) This is correct, there was no Son in the Flesh until he was begotten, period.
Quote: Quote: - "the Word became the Son" (BBB, Sep 02, page 8 (middle of right-mostThis is also correct, the Word became the Son in the flesh when the Word was Begotten.
Quote: - "His Sonship, which began at His incarnation" (BBB, Oct 02, page 8 (bottom of 3rd column)Once again this is correct, the Son became flesh and dwelt among us.
Quote:For those who do not have this information they are at the mercy of those who do, and they have no idea at all how badly this has been distorted.
Share This