Brian,

Quote:
- "We are simply saying that The Word was not the Son before He was so begotten" (BBB, Sep 02, page 8 (from the same paragraph you asked me to quote!)



This is correct, there was no Son in the Flesh until he was begotten, period.

Quote:

- "the Word became the Son" (BBB, Sep 02, page 8 (middle of right-most


This is also correct, the Word became the Son in the flesh when the Word was Begotten.

Quote:
- "His Sonship, which began at His incarnation" (BBB, Oct 02, page 8 (bottom of 3rd column)


Once again this is correct, the Son became flesh and dwelt among us.


-
Quote:
"Eternal Godship title, Yes! But eternal Sonship title, No!" (BBB, Oct 02, page 16 (middle of second column))




When putting all the facts from those articles on the table you see exactly what Ruckman believes, and the Word of God proves his point. What you have done was taken those quotes and misrepresent what Ruckman believes and what other KJVonlys believe. This is why you are not enjoying my post. And yes your man is a liar.

For those who do not have this information they are at the mercy of those who do, and they have no idea at all how badly this has been distorted.
Shain1611

"SANCTIFY THEM THROUGH THY TRUTH: THY WORD IS TRUTH
(John 17:17)

And Jesus Speaking; " He that rejecteth me, receiveth not my words, hath one that, judgeth him:the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in
( John12:48 KJV)