Shain,

Quote:

And until I read all three articals that Ruckman wrote, I can't see why you are making such a big deal out of this.



Shain, YOU brought this all up by calling Ross a liar for saying some KJV-only supporters deny the eternal Sonship. I provided proof that Ross was indeed correct. Read the article (all three parts). Respond directly to the quotes I gave you in response to your challenge. Then I'll get to your other comments. No more side-stepping, no more straw men - it's been a month since this started and you still haven't dealt with the original quotes from Ruckman and Evans I gave on this subject!

"We are simply saying that The Word was not the Son before He was so begotten", "the Word became the Son", "His Sonship, which began at His incarnation", "Eternal Godship title, Yes! But eternal Sonship title, No!"

What part of "No!" don't you understand???