Quote:
This section of Daniel was written in Aramaic, not Hebrew. However, the same principle applies, as there are no upper case letters in Aramaic.


It originally was in Aramaic, which the 'bar' is, where if it had been Hebrew it would have been 'ben'. But it is in heberw letters in the tanakh, that is why I didn't really make a distinction.

Quote:
maybe it would be a good idea to get back to the subject instead of a further discussion of the use of capitals, which I in innocence began.. sorry for the thread drift Shain..


I think it is important to note that the KJV capitalizes in order to put emphasize a point they are trying to make when in the original language there was not emphasize on that word. It is the trick of the writers to try to make it appear that Jsus was mentioned in the Tanack.