Continue ..

Let us continue... as you will see there is a slight Calvinist flavor to this twist, and to force this issue into the light now will show you what I'm talking about.

Rom 3:4 God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

Keeping that thought in mind always letting God's Word tell it like it is.
God the Word , who was with God, had the same preexistent essence in the sense of " God IS Spirit." However, something in that " God is Spirit" essence changed when God the Son was born and came in the flesh as the God/man, denial of which makes one antichrist.

Calvinists must inject their philosophy into the Bible by inventing extra-scriptural terminology; ... effectual calling, irresistible grace, unconditional election, eternal day, same essence, eternal Sonship, eternal generation, and so forth. Nevertheless, is the logical outcome of their " same essence( Father and Son)" premise the " eternal generation of the Father" or an " eternally begotten Father?" If they are the same essence in the sense that eternal Sonship advocates mean it, then they are both begotten. No? Think about that ..

See when you begin to carry this thing out farther and farther you begin seeing something just doesn't make sense. See they have " eternal generations; eternally begotten." How does that work? These are inventive Phraseology by theologically interpolated by certain Calvinists, who would bind and/or impose on others ancient "creeds" and " confessions," which do no even agree with each oher. We ain't buying their theological semantic bamboozie!

You see this " Sonship " thing came out of this Article in the " Bible Believers Bulletin," which I have been quoting from to refute all the misinformation out their presented by so called Christians who have attacked KJBonly on this matter , and they have done so falsely.

continue..

Here is a quote from C. H. Spurgeon " The dispute concerning the eternal filiation of our Lord betrays more of presumptuous curiosity than of reverent faith. It is an ATTEMPT to explain where it is far better to adore. We could give rival expositions of this verse, but we forbear. The controversy is one of the most unprofitable which ever engaged the pens of theologinas."

Here is the that verse: " For unto which of the angels said he at any time, thou art my Son, THIS DAY have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father and he shall be to me a Son" Heb. 1:5

Psa 2:7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.

Shain1611

"SANCTIFY THEM THROUGH THY TRUTH: THY WORD IS TRUTH
(John 17:17)

And Jesus Speaking; " He that rejecteth me, receiveth not my words, hath one that, judgeth him:the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in
( John12:48 KJV)