Yuku free message boards
Username or E-mail:
Password:
Forgot
Password?
Sign Up
Grab the Yuku app
Search:
RSS
Email
Who's your Final Authority
>
Which Bible
>
LXX/72 Redpath
0 Points
Search this Topic:
Remove this ad
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next»
Jump
Forum Jump
Bible Rejecters and More
Bible School by the "Book"
Welcome to the King James Bible School
Our Statement of Faith and Our Forum Guidelines
Welcome to all New Members
Prayers and Prayer Request
New Forum
Bible School on Line for Free
General Discussion
Roman Catholicism, its Doctrines, and Church Teachings Debated here.
End Times Prophecies ; Eschatology
Which Bible
Daily Bible Verse Comparison
Reading Room
Cults
Christian only Bible Study Forum With great Sermons to listen to
For Non Christians and Non Believers
General Forum I
Bible Dictionary
Bible DictionaryII
General ForumII
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Re: LXX/72 Redpath
Author
Comment
bibleprotector
Re: LXX/72 Redpath
#1
[-]
Posts
: 345
Jun 8 07 10:18 AM
Reply
Quote
More
My Recent Posts
1. The LXX existed, and was used by the first Christians, and the Holy Ghost was able to work, despite its corruption.
2. The LXX was used by the translators of the KJB, who knew it to be quite imperfect.
3. Presently, the LXX can be studied in light of the traditional Protestant view in relation to the King James Bible. There is very little place and use in ordinary study of the King James Bible doctrine for the Greek Textus Receptus, so likewise, how small an issue the LXX really should be.
4. Denying the traditional Protestant view of the LXX is unrealistic, unreasonable and foolish.
5. The modernist emphasis on the LXX is consistent with the spirit of error.
I think what has happened is when the modernists said something, that there has been an "ultra-conservative" resistance. The modernists said, the KJB has been revised, therefore it can be revised again. Of course, it would be wrong to have new revisions, but it is also wrong to then deny that any historical revision had taken place. Eventually, because there was a rejection of what the modernists stood for, everything that the modernists said became "wrong". When really the modernists were actually misinterpreting the facts, but in the minds of the ultra-conservative, the very facts themselves became suspect. (E.g. evolutionists said that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, therefore my parents told me that there were no such things as dinosaurs.) This has happened with the LXX too. Because the modernists have the wrong interpretation does not mean that the base facts are wrong.
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Forum Jump
Bible Rejecters and More
Bible School by the "Book"
Welcome to the King James Bible School
Our Statement of Faith and Our Forum Guidelines
Welcome to all New Members
Prayers and Prayer Request
New Forum
Bible School on Line for Free
General Discussion
Roman Catholicism, its Doctrines, and Church Teachings Debated here.
End Times Prophecies ; Eschatology
Which Bible
Daily Bible Verse Comparison
Reading Room
Cults
Christian only Bible Study Forum With great Sermons to listen to
For Non Christians and Non Believers
General Forum I
Bible Dictionary
Bible DictionaryII
General ForumII
Share This
Email to Friend
del.icio.us
Digg it
Facebook
Blogger
Yahoo MyWeb
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next»
Jump
Who's your Final Authority
>
Which Bible
>
LXX/72 Redpath
Click to subscribe by RSS
Click to receive E-mail notifications of replies