Yes CJ1611.
I really enjoy the input of bibleprotector,but I do think he is deficient in his understanding of the LXX.Or that I am not understanding him.
This is why I asked the question.
Not that I am any great scholar or anything.
But I have done a little research and have listened to the best on various sides of the issue.

Ruckman says the 1611 Translators were wrong in their opinion on this account.

Bibleprotector seems to find an understanding that includes the LXX as a type of legitimacy, yet seeing the errors in it.
At least,this is what I am detecting with his verbage.

Am I right bibleprotector? Or am I a bit off base in my understanding of your points.

Holy Bible
There is only one.