Steven,

Is it not said that the Early Church Fathers were defending the LXX to be correct, against the Hebrew which was said to be corrupt? Can you provide an overview of what is generally said concerning the LXX in the period of something like 50 BC to 450 BC? Even if you provide this in the context of your own view/refutation of the common/modernist/scholarly view of the LXX in those years?

(We know that how few corruptions have been in some of the Hebrew, and how that the KJB has got it right.)

Matthew