Yuku free message boards
Username or E-mail:
Password:
Forgot
Password?
Sign Up
Grab the Yuku app
Search:
RSS
Email
Who's your Final Authority
>
Which Bible
>
LXX/72 Redpath
0 Points
Search this Topic:
Remove this ad
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next»
Jump
Forum Jump
Bible Rejecters and More
Bible School by the "Book"
Welcome to the King James Bible School
Our Statement of Faith and Our Forum Guidelines
Welcome to all New Members
Prayers and Prayer Request
New Forum
Bible School on Line for Free
General Discussion
Roman Catholicism, its Doctrines, and Church Teachings Debated here.
End Times Prophecies ; Eschatology
Which Bible
Daily Bible Verse Comparison
Reading Room
Cults
Christian only Bible Study Forum With great Sermons to listen to
For Non Christians and Non Believers
General Forum I
Bible Dictionary
Bible DictionaryII
General ForumII
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Re: LXX/72 Redpath
Author
Comment
Praxean
Re: Psalm 22:16 - the only textual issue of Messianic pro
#1
[-]
Posts
: 348
Jul 22 07 5:35 PM
Reply
Quote
More
My Recent Posts
Hi Folks,
Thanks for following and the kind words, HolyBible.
Here is an analogy with the NT to consider.
We have a pure line (Textus Receptus) and impure versions (Alexandrian especially). The Alexandrian texts are all over the map, corrupt, inconsistent.
Dean Burgon pointed out how some of the Alexandrian corruptions arose, in his :
.
Causes of the Corruption of the Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels
Ehrman, with support from folks like Wallace, turns this on its head and accuses the Received Text of being a church-tampered text, discussing verses like 1 Timothy 3:16 and the Johannine Comma and Luke 2:33 with spiritual deception and guile.
We know Ehrman is totally wrong, what he accuses of being tampering is God's Bible, what he trumpets are tawdry corruptions.
Similarly in the Tanach we have a pure line, the Hebrew-Aramaic Masoretic Text, generally supported by the early Vulgate Latin and Aramaic Peshitta translations.
And we have a line rife with corruptions, mostly Greek OT, with no consistency and with tawdry corruptions like putting Romans 3 into Psalm 14.
The Greek OT (socalled LXX) texts are all over the map, corrupt, inconsistent.
And we are told by some (e.g. Christian Identity and other Septuagint pushers) that these are the true texts, and the Masoretic line is corrupt. They claim that the Masoretic line is unreliable, tampered for messianic prophecies, an accusation that should have been put in the dustbin with the discovery of the Great Isaiah Scroll.
This accusation is as deceptive and false as the Ehrman accusation against the NT text. It is an attempt to fight againt the historic Bible. (This does not mean that every statement made by Ehrman or Septuagint-pushers is false, simply the whole perspective and the vast majority of claims and analysis.)
King James Bible supporters do very well to uphold the Received Texts of both the Tanach and NT. The Hebrew-Aramaic Masoretic Text and the Greek Textus Receptus.
And the perfect and pure King James Bible clarifies any small difficulties and differentials in those underlying texts, shining brightly, and gives us the perfect word of God.
Thank you Lord Jesus.
Shalom,
Steven Avery
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Forum Jump
Bible Rejecters and More
Bible School by the "Book"
Welcome to the King James Bible School
Our Statement of Faith and Our Forum Guidelines
Welcome to all New Members
Prayers and Prayer Request
New Forum
Bible School on Line for Free
General Discussion
Roman Catholicism, its Doctrines, and Church Teachings Debated here.
End Times Prophecies ; Eschatology
Which Bible
Daily Bible Verse Comparison
Reading Room
Cults
Christian only Bible Study Forum With great Sermons to listen to
For Non Christians and Non Believers
General Forum I
Bible Dictionary
Bible DictionaryII
General ForumII
Share This
Email to Friend
del.icio.us
Digg it
Facebook
Blogger
Yahoo MyWeb
«Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next»
Jump
Who's your Final Authority
>
Which Bible
>
LXX/72 Redpath
Click to subscribe by RSS
Click to receive E-mail notifications of replies