Quote:
And fourth, a question, in regards to the early Greek speaking Christians, did they not adopt the LXX as the OT, and did not this in some way come to a difference of view between those Christians and the Jews in regard to the Hebrew? (And was not the Hebrew actually superior to the LXX, but the Christians were promoting the LXX?)

*******
No, the Christians were not supporting the LXX[72] at that early date,for there was none,but many were starting to corrupt the word of God,and it culminated in Aquila [turned to Judaism] and Symmachus and Theodotian,[both Ebionites,heretics] and finally,Origen with his Students of Eusebius and others.
It was heretics and Alexandrian Christians, [AD] if you could call them that.This still leaves the opening and begs the question,If there really was an LXX[72],then where is it?Granted just because it has no complete MSS support does not mean that there never was a complete LXX[72].

When we see a corruption in the current Bibles,they most invariably are attributed to the LXX[72]family.So any real LXX[72] is not a pre-Christ thing,but a pre-cannon thing.
This is the crux of it all.

Peter Fuhrman
Every word of God is pure: