Yuku free message boards
Username or E-mail:
Password:
Forgot
Password?
Sign Up
Grab the Yuku app
Search:
RSS
Email
Who's your Final Authority
>
Which Bible
>
Lev. 11:16 gull or cuckow?
0 Points
Search this Topic:
Remove this ad
Forum Jump
Bible Rejecters and More
Bible School by the "Book"
Welcome to the King James Bible School
Our Statement of Faith and Our Forum Guidelines
Welcome to all New Members
Prayers and Prayer Request
New Forum
Bible School on Line for Free
General Discussion
Roman Catholicism, its Doctrines, and Church Teachings Debated here.
End Times Prophecies ; Eschatology
Which Bible
Daily Bible Verse Comparison
Reading Room
Cults
Christian only Bible Study Forum With great Sermons to listen to
For Non Christians and Non Believers
General Forum I
Bible Dictionary
Bible DictionaryII
General ForumII
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Re: Lev. 11:16 gull or cuckow?
Author
Comment
steelmaker
Re: Lev. 11:16 gull or cuckow?
#1
[-]
Posts
: 7270
Jul 23 07 11:56 AM
Reply
Quote
More
My Recent Posts
Bibleprotector:
Pre 1611 Bibles (Tyndale, Coverdale, Matthew, Great, Geneva, Bishops') are all pure Bibles. They do contain impurities in the same way that the 1611 Edition contained impurities, and they also contain impurities in text and translation. But this does not mean that they were not pure, nor the Word of God.
THIS IS INSANE!
They were either pure or impure. if they contain impurities, they are NOT pure...simple as THAT!
To say they were both pure & contain impurities is ABSOLUTELY CRAZY!
Remember that Psalm 119:140 says "very pure" which means there is degrees of purity. So Tyndale was pure. But in time, there was a purer Bible: the King James.
HOW NUTTY! Pure is PURE! If there are degrees of purity, it woulda been so stated, I. E. "75% pure". If it simply says 'pure', it's 100% pure, & that's THAT!
Also, Psalm 12 specifically speaks of how God's words are tried and undergo a process to ensure that they are pure. This happened in English. God's words in Tyndale's Bible are better presented in the King James Bible. (Tyndale's work was incomplete anyway.)
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY WRONG!
Psalm 12 says NO SUCH THING!
In it, David COMPARES God's word to purified silver. Anyone who can read 3rd grade English can see that!
Only a NUT CASE or an UNBELIEVER would say Psalm 12 indicates God's words needed purified!
We know that some words in Hebrew were hard to know the meaning, but this was resolved by doing the best possible in the KJB translation, and their choices have been afterward vindicated. It is really a modernist opinion to come against the KJB, though there were others who for evil/wrong reasons came against the KJB such as Broughton, Romanists and even some Puritans in the Commonwealth.
POPPYCOCK!
The AV men guessed at some of those hebrew names, same as later translators did, same as earlier ones did.
And what's wrong with being modernist? After all, GOD IS!
Your stuff is so goofy! No wonder even the other KJVOs make funna you! Try taking your thorazine & electroshock therapy before ya post, & ya just might make a little sense.
<< Previous Topic
Next Topic >>
Forum Jump
Bible Rejecters and More
Bible School by the "Book"
Welcome to the King James Bible School
Our Statement of Faith and Our Forum Guidelines
Welcome to all New Members
Prayers and Prayer Request
New Forum
Bible School on Line for Free
General Discussion
Roman Catholicism, its Doctrines, and Church Teachings Debated here.
End Times Prophecies ; Eschatology
Which Bible
Daily Bible Verse Comparison
Reading Room
Cults
Christian only Bible Study Forum With great Sermons to listen to
For Non Christians and Non Believers
General Forum I
Bible Dictionary
Bible DictionaryII
General ForumII
Share This
Email to Friend
del.icio.us
Digg it
Facebook
Blogger
Yahoo MyWeb
Who's your Final Authority
>
Which Bible
>
Lev. 11:16 gull or cuckow?
Click to subscribe by RSS
Click to receive E-mail notifications of replies