Holy Bible, I like your Moses picture.

Because we do not presently have the resources of having online copies or whatever of the 1629 Edition, 1638 Edition and 1769 Edition, we have to rely on Scrivener, Norton and Norris. I have done some comparisons too. (While Norris has spent his time with some of his comparisons, at least it means that we are building an overall textual picture even of variant editions and so forth, and means that we do not have to waste our time on investigating side branches in the KJB text tree.)

I think that the 1663 and the 1726 editions (of any publisher) will follow the 1638 Edition, and I assume that Oxfords, Londons and Cambridges following the 1638 Edition (this is pre-1762) will probably have some slight variations between them just as the post-1769 text does between the big three.

If you use Scriveners Appendix A and C and/or Nortons list in his book, you can soon identify by looking at various passages listed and the date of the change given, where your Bibles fit in the scheme of things.

When doing comparisons, as Norris has provided us with, it is always good to supply which KJB you are comparing too, i.e. what is the standard you are comparing against? Scrivener was comparing against the 1858 Cambridge, Waite was comparing against the 1917 Scofield Oxford, Norton seems to mix using the Pure Cambridge Edition and the Concord Edition without acknowledging any difference, and Kizziah used the Concord Cambridge to compare the Cambridge Standard Text Edition.

So, just what edition has Norris been using as his standard KJB for comparison?
counsellors (Ezra 7:14) either an Oxford or the Concord Cambridge
soap (Jer. 2:22) not 1769 or 19th century Oxford
I suspect probably the Scofield Oxford.
When I compare, I use the Pure Cambridge Edition.
I am saying this just to be aware that using the Scofield is going to come up with some differences to using the PCE when comparing to another edition.
Thus, if Norris is comparing and saying and is different because it is absent in Exodus 23:23 the Hivites in most present editions, he would be factually correct. However, when we say present KJB we mean PCE.

Exodus 23:23
the Hivites 1611, 1613, 1769, 1917 Scofield
and the Hivites 1629, 1638, 1762, PCE

Jeremiah 34:16
whom he 1629, 1638, 1917 Scofield
whom ye 1611, 1613, 1762, 1769, PCE

Note that in the first example our witnesses for the pure reading differ to the second example, which shows that we must take into account that there are seven witnesses, though only one is totally correct. (1611 He, 1611 She, 1613, 1629, 1638, 1769 and PCE.)