<when did I ever say that SALVATION depended on an orthodox church being involved?>

I asked you this directly, a while back, and you disappeared from here for a couple of days. And when you returned, you never did answer "No, it doesn't".

<what I am saying is that a person who denies orthodox doctrine.....>

what you call "orthodox doctrine" is NOT "THE WORD OF GOD". Why do you refer to it as "DOCTRINE" when "SCRIPTURE" alone "IS PROFITABLE FOR DOCTRINE"??? you are attempting once more to elevate man made writings to the level of "THE WORD OF GOD" which IT IS NOT.

<....PROBABLY not SAVED despite the fact they claim they are>

I've been "SAVED BY GRACE THROUGH FAITH" in my LORD and SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST because I "HEAR" and "BELIEVE IN HIM" AND "THE WORD OF GOD".
And i REJECT the idea that there is any other "doctrine" outside of "THE WORD OF GOD" which is "PROFITABLE FOR DOCTRINE", including, but not limited to any "creed" or "church" writing by man. "THE WORD OF GOD" teaches "FAITH cometh by HEARING AND HEARING BY THE WORD OF GOD". "IT IS WRITTEN" and "IT IS" sufficient in ALL THINGS.

<how can you be SAVED by SOMEONE(JESUS CHRIST) you don't BELIEVE IN?>

once again you REJECT THE "TRUTH", "THE WORD OF GOD" ITSELF which SAYS "FAITH cometh by HEARING AND HEARING BY THE WORD OF GOD". I have "HEARD" and "BELIEVED". Clearly you haven't, because you question "THE WORD OF GOD'S" sufficiency which I BELIEVE IN.

you need to examine where you picked up and believe the FALSE teaching that "THE WORD OF GOD" is NOT sufficient in proclaiming WHO GOD IS. Or that a person like myself who "BELIEVES IN HIM" and "THE WORD OF GOD" does not "KNOW THE CERTAINTY" as to WHO their LORD and SAVIOUR IS. You didn't learn what you are trying to teach here about this from a "BELIEVER IN HIM", that's for sure. 

And this lockstep "modalist" rant which is only recent here amongst many of the posters does you no favors. It points to FALSE teaching. 100%

"MY sheep HEAR MY VOICE"