Well, my points been made.


Your points have been refuted by Scripture


 
No one here claims modalism.


You have gone by your narrow definition to make that claim, but you of course have not addressed the broader definition. You still continue to deny the trinity, so whats your point? You are still peddling heresy whether it be modalism or some other way of denying the trinity.


  Only accusers.

Only those identifying heresy.

  And when proven wrong they want to change the definition of Modalism to fit the accusations. 


Nobody has been proven wrong except those who deny the trinity. Put aside modalism you still deny the trinity.


  For example, when you bring up countless verses in which God says he was one God, they claim uniplural words and change the word "God" from singular to plural. 


I guess you have become a Hebrew scholar? The Bible was originally written in Greek and Hebrew not English. When you become a scholar of either language then you can make such ridiculous staetments, but until then.....

When you bring up verses in which James say we are justified by works and faith and saved by works and faith, they change the meaning of the words "justified" and "saved". 


Again, when you do not rightly divide the word of truth or study Scripture (comparing Scripture with Scripture) instead of just reading it and not searching the deep things of God you will end up with contradictions like you do. James and Paul are in harmony while you claim James is teaching error. Who is the true student of Scripture?

So there are no modalists here.  Only those who are on an inquistion.


There are plenty of trinity deniers here and since it is the constant teaching of the orthodox Christian church for 2,000 years it is the duty of those who are orthodox to point out the heresies of people like yourself, for one to keep young believers from falling into your trap. 

Proverbs 29:2 "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn."