That's what I like about you Tim.  I don't have to respond.  I can just sit back and let you babble on (Babylon).  I can let you change your posts several times and say nothing.  Your words are enough.


Instead of attacking and mocking me why don't you simply answer the questions I posed to you? I don't like you much either ( I don't abide heretics that well) but at least I answer what you say without making your snide derogatory comments. I also see that Brian is right in line with what I have said, and I gave you more definitions , but instead you fall back on the tried and true attack, go after Steelmaker and his assertion you are a Modalist. To counter that this is what Brian said:

Not all modalists believe the modes are "consecutive and never simultaneous". Modalism is more about the nature of his existence than the timing of the forms his appearance to others. As such, there are several here that are rightly called "modalists", regardless of their affinity for the term itself. Instead of "mode", if Jerry wants to use "office" or you want to use "thingy", that doesn't change the underlying modalism.
That is exactly the correct response and basically shows that the underlying belief of you and Jerry is an underlying modalsim without clinging to the narrow definition that CARM gave you which you latched onto running around saying, "see, see I am not a modalist" to which Brian said and something Steelmaker and myself have been pointing out:

 Regardless of what you call yourselves, you guys sure ain't Trinitarian.

Proverbs 29:2 "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn."
Last Edited By: XrcTim Feb 9 10 4:28 PM. Edited 1 times.