BrianT wrote:

I'm just here looking for all these so called "modalists"


Not all modalists believe the modes are "consecutive and never simultaneous". Modalism is more about the nature of his existence than the timing of the forms his appearance to others. As such, there are several here that are rightly called "modalists", regardless of their affinity for the term itself. Instead of "mode", if Jerry wants to use "office" or you want to use "thingy", that doesn't change the underlying modalism.
I am dealing with the definition given.  I use the term "thingy" not out of disrespect, but I because I have heard Trinitarians use a variety of terms.  If you look back at the hundreds of posts on this topic over the past month, you will see I am not of the belief that God never manifested himself all at the same time.  I respect verses like Mat 3:16.  The only thing I don't agree with the Trinity doctrine is that they are three separate, distinct personalities, persons, offices, personages or whatever you want to call them.  

While I admit that Jesus and the Bible talk as if they are separate at times, many times Jesus and the Bible talks as if they are not separate. 

My overall point is that there are a lot of silly people running around saying "You are a modalist!" and I have yet to find one who claims a Modalist belief on this board.

  

Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Jas 2:24
Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.