I'm just here looking for all these so called "modalists"


Not all modalists believe the modes are "consecutive and never simultaneous". Modalism is more about the nature of his existence than the timing of the forms his appearance to others. As such, there are several here that are rightly called "modalists", regardless of their affinity for the term itself. Instead of "mode", if Jerry wants to use "office" or you want to use "thingy", that doesn't change the underlying modalism.

Brian